| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 143% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180226 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 05 '20 at 14:59 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.5%
Very good
|
80% 141 Pts
|
47% 341 Pts
|
23% 375 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
143%
Outstanding
|
168% 197 fps
|
125% 156 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$79
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 142 126 125 119 116 MB/s
|
88.9%
Excellent
|
60% 272 MB/s
|
157% 61.1 MB/s
|
192% 271 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.4%
Good
|
68% 23.6 GB/s
|
55% 19.3 GB/s
|
53% 75 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 885 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 172x |
| Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 167x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 85x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 146x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 62x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 53x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |