| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200416 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 05 '20 at 08:12 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | COL-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
88% 159 Pts
|
79% 636 Pts
|
48% 774 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
59.3%
Above average
|
62% 81.9 fps
|
54% 68.2 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESE.M16FE 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
51.3%
Above average
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
50% 17.3 GB/s
|
60% 66.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S Builds (Compare 1,353 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S - $113
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 712x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 183x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 164x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 400x |
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 105x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 92x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 77% - Very good | Total price: $486 |