Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200416
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 06:41
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 86.9
1-Core 127
2-Core 254
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 742
76% 612 Pts
64-Core 753
47% 753 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
ASRock(1849 5032) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 112
Parallax 99
64% 96.5 fps
MRender 75.2
Gravity 88.3
Splatting 54.6
58% 72.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S190802a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 398 351 268 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 378
Write 408
Mixed 346
SusWrite 274
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 34.7
136% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 312
210% 253 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 101%
UFD USB Flash Drive 16GB
10GB free, PID d757
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 8.8 8.7 8.6 8 8.4 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
9.05% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 6.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7.7
13% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.05%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D30AESE.M16FE 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S Builds (Compare 1,353 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING S - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $486
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback