Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive302% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 20:41
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 248
92% 161 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 676
73% 577 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Asus(1043 8676) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2340 MHz, MLim: 3557 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
2.67% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 15
2% 17.5 fps
MRender 19.1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.5
5% 6.73 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$376
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1201 921 934 957 963 929 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
302% Outstanding
Read 2396
Write 1,472
Mixed 1177
SusWrite 984
335% 1,507 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 93.2
301% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,305
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 1,140
863% 1,165 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 302%
Great: 246%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
103GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 161 162 163 163 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 357
Write 216
Mixed 249
SusWrite 158
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 45
169% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 182
147% 207 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 87%
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
416GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 465 459 457 457 446 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 438
Mixed 294
SusWrite 456
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 40.3
150% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 68.1
131% 261 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
WD WD10EARX-00N0YB0 1TB
494GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 113 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 128
Write 108
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 111
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 40.6
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 36
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 47
SC Mixed 31.7
96% 33.7 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 112%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $707
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback