Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 19:40
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 250
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 696
72% 577 Pts
64-Core 718
44% 718 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Asus(1043 8676) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 173
Reflection 176
Parallax 190
141% 180 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 156
Splatting 131
125% 156 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$376
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1101 944 922 928 611 541 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,182
Write 1,082
Mixed 629
SusWrite 841
261% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 64
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 86.8
287% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,322
DQ Write 1,040
DQ Mixed 1,100
845% 1,154 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 281%
Great: 246%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
103GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 159 159 162 152 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 401
Write 214
Mixed 238
SusWrite 158
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 46.3
163% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 169
137% 195 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 87%
Kingston SHSS37A480G 480GB
416GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 443 445 453 456 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 451
Mixed 292
SusWrite 443
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 37.4
142% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 67.8
130% 260 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
WD WD10EARX-00N0YB0 1TB
494GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 110 110 110 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 69
Write 67.7
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 109
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 21.9
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $707
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback