Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C70-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE PRO C70-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 20:15
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 143
57% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 199
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA88) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.12% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.12%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 293 292 293 297 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 444
Write 297
Mixed 268
SusWrite 291
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 20.9
84% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 54.7
DQ Mixed 101
104% 180 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 128%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
255GB free
Firmware: AX0A4M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 71 71 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 57.4
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 70.3
39% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3160ME68FAF1600 GR1600S364L11/8G 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE PRO C70-A Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE PRO C70-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback