Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive85.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 07:13
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 646
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 101 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 509
Write 416
Mixed 382
SusWrite 65.7
76% 343 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 42.5
156% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 213
183% 268 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 91%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
55GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 116 119 121 120 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
37GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 132 139 136 143 139 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
71GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 128 131 131 132 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 123
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 130
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
15GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 130 126 134 135 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 145
Write 51.5
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 129
68% 93.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
54GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 132 138 136 144 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 118
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 133
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
468% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
1TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 132 139 136 144 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 150
Write 142
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 135
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
244% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
1GB free
Firmware: SC60
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 108
Mixed 86.2
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
197% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
1TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 105 110 119 99 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 121
Write 117
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 115
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
1GB free
Firmware: FS2A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 101
Mixed 55.8
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
140GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 79 77 81 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 157
Write 183
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 76.5
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
167GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 68 68 71 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 94.9
Write 97.7
Mixed 66.9
SusWrite 67.1
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 84%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
3.5TB free
Firmware: 7101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 164 167 171 167 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
384GB free
Firmware: 7101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 100 100 109 100 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 125
Write 114
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 102
67% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0821 16G-D3-1600-MR 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0821 16G-D3-1600-MR 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.3
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII HERO Builds (Compare 3,805 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII HERO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $633
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback