TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Nitro AN517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Superb_CFS
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '20 at 19:59
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 83.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 255
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 660
71% 564 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 85%
 Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1333) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 7.2
5% 26.6 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.13 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.92%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1248 1442 1475 1471 1474 805 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 1,707
Write 1,497
Mixed 1,167
SusWrite 1,319
320% 1,423 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 54.3
178% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 899
DQ Write 754
DQ Mixed 852
631% 835 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑
This bench: 241%
 Great: 239%
ASMT 2115 1TB
165GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 240 242 242 241 234 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 223
Write 210
Mixed 211
SusWrite 236
301% 220 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 22.5
1,725% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.1
DQ Write 26
DQ Mixed 23.2
1,752% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑
This bench: 168%
 Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FE 12GB
2667, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.5% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 19.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.2
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 68.5%
 Great: 69%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Nitro AN517-51 Builds (Compare 2,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN517-51

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1,122x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples969x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 68%, 23,588 samples399x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples1,258x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples632x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples343x
SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples311x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 188%, 4,220 samples280x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples224x
RAM
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 17,072 samples307x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples301x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples173x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback