User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Hewlett-Packard
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2A92
Memory	4.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100907
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '20 at 15:00
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 60.4 1-Core 43.8 2-Core 80.2 39% 61.5 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 242 25% 200 Pts	64-Core 250 15% 250 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3417) CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.1% Above average	Lighting 65 Reflection 61 Parallax 86.6 53% 70.9 fps	MRender 63.3 Gravity 69.6 Splatting 46.1 48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 493GB free (System drive) Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 14 16 27 44 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 68 Write 60.6 Mixed 55 SusWrite 33.2 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS5C3015ALA632 1.5TB 531 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 503GB free Firmware: ML5OA580 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 93 99 92 92 94 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 73.2 Write 83.6 Mixed 43.3 SusWrite 94.9 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 66%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB 4,756 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 86 82 83 90 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 84.8 Write 99.6 Mixed 53.2 SusWrite 86.7 60% 81.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.5 144% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 67%
WDC WD15 EADS-65R2B0 1.5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1TB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 24 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.4% Very poor	Read 23 Write 22.7 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 23.3 30% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA1339.C16F CT51264BA1339.C16F 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.6% Poor	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 10 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 6.8 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 28%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16