Hyrican H110M PRO-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 54% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Hyrican H110M PRO-D (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)
Memory	9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161107
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '20 at 13:45
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 105 2-Core 203 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 569 59% 472 Pts	64-Core 575 36% 575 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.4% Very good	Lighting 86.5 Reflection 94.1 Parallax 90.7 70% 90.4 fps	MRender 88.9 Gravity 89.6 Splatting 89.3 73% 89.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS120G32TND-N1A2A 120GB 1,141 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 454 Write 388 Mixed 362 89% 402 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 40.2 137% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 321 238% 315 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 840GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 151 170 170 169 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 166 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 163 94% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 107%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 135 134 135 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 142 Write 127 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 132 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 2x8GB 2,416 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.7% Above average	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 19 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M PRO-D Builds (Compare 147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

System: Hyrican H110M PRO-D

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	59x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	36x
Core i5-6600Intel $139Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	44x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	15x

SSD
Premier SP550 240GBAdata $74Bench 79%, 29,295 samples	10x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x
SP580 120GBAdataBench 54%, 3,644 samples	6x

RAM
CT8G4DFS8213.M8FB 2x8GBCrucialBench 67%, 1,583 samples	23x
CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 3,127 samples	19x
CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 66%, 2,416 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16