Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory44.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 15:22
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 80.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 253
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 959
86% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,318
82% 1,318 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 76.4
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 79.5
62% 82.3 fps
MRender 80.3
Gravity 76.4
Splatting 70.5
61% 75.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 450 446 445 446 445 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 470
Write 435
Mixed 402
SusWrite 377
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 19.8
4K Mixed 12.3
64% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 96.7
DQ Write 26.9
DQ Mixed 34.5
32% 52.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 109 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 126
Write 132
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 105
71% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.8
235% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVGB CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GVKB 48GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 30.6
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 28.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $571
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback