HP 500-307nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP 500-307nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF7
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 21:56
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3240-$51
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 69.6
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 176
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 176
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 705
MSI(1462 B593) 1GB
CLim: 873 MHz, MLim: 412 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 0.9
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
771GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 160 169 179 183 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 173
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 149
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
218GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 120 126 125 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 109
Write 105
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 124
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Kingston HP698650-154-KEF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
47.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500-307nf Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 500-307nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback