Lenovo 10BQS00900

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10BQS00900  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Annapurna CRB
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 19:05
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 58.5
2-Core 108
52% 81.8 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 173
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D
Legend(17AA 3089) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.18% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 4.6
4% 6 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 7.2
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.18%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 650 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 303 184 68 75 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 320
Write 288
Mixed 291
SusWrite 162
60% 265 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 21.7
82% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 75.5
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 146
113% 149 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 82%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
39GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 127
Mixed 75
77% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 86%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
230GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 88.8
Mixed 66
59% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 85%
External USB3.0 2TB
190GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 81 84 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 137
Write 107
Mixed 21
SusWrite 82.5
107% 87 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 50%
External USB3.0 2TB
144GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 68 66 66 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.2% Below average
Read 142
Write 103
Mixed 20
SusWrite 67.3
100% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 37%
External USB3.0 2TB
2GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 137
Write 81
Mixed 19.8
84% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.7 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 11
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 9.5
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback