HP Spectre x360 Convertible

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 96% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemHP Spectre x360 Convertible  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 804E
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 17:32
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%
CPU Throttled 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 166
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 201
32% 232 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 804E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.6
3% 4 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 6.9
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN512HCJH-000H1 512GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT22H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 281 201 162 163 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 396
Write 294
Mixed 260
SusWrite 204
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 31.1
114% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 260
202% 282 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDFB164A1MA-JD-F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.6
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Spectre x360 Convertible Builds (Compare 571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Spectre x360 Convertible

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback