Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 17:16
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
50% Average
Memory 57.9
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 118
49% 82.2 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 234
32% 240 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 8746) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 17.8
14% 17.8 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 17
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3Z40107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 56 197 18 110 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.7% Below average
Read 218
Write 178
Mixed 184
SusWrite 124
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 14.1
64% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.9
DQ Write 72.6
DQ Mixed 21.2
24% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 102%
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75
250GB free
Firmware: MH001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 85 87 86 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 94.6
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 85.2
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 56%
Toshiba MK2561GSYN 250GB-$19
145GB free
Firmware: MH000D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 89 88 89 89 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 23.4
Write 41.1
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 81.8
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 56%
Hitachi HTS543216L9A300 160GB
99GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 56 55 56 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 56.5
Write 41.7
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 56
61% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 24%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
359GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 91 91 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 89.3
Write 13.5
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 88.9
70% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 029E CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 11.2
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,282 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback