ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo Lenovo IdeaPad U310

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Lenovo Lenovo IdeaPad U310 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lenovo
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130304
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '20 at 14:18
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	51.3% Above average	Memory 81.7 1-Core 50 2-Core 87.1 48% 72.9 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 126 17% 125 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 3903) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3958 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 2.6 2% 2.9 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.77 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
MT-64 60GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 56GB free Firmware: T0611A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 249 276 257 277 276 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.8% Above average	Read 392 Write 274 Mixed 270 SusWrite 268 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 54.4 4K Mixed 15.5 78% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 98.5 DQ Mixed 19.3 27% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 58%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2012)-$79 15,506 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 52 55 52 58 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 69 Write 69 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 55.1 42% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 2.2 2.8 2.8 2.9 2.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	4.31% Terrible	Read 19 Write 3.5 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 2.6 8% 7.65 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.31% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 1x8GB 1,072 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 9.7 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Lenovo IdeaPad U310 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo Lenovo IdeaPad U310

CPU
Core i5-3337UIntelBench 47%, 33,616 samples	3x
Core i3-2377MIntelBench 44%, 962 samples	3x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	5x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	3x

SSD
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	1x
MZMPA024HMCD-000L1 24GBSamsungBench 24%, 163 samples	1x
480GB 480GBSSDBench 65%, 2,159 samples	1x

RAM
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,855 samples	3x
9905428-087.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 28%, 464 samples	1x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback