Asus P9X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79  (all builds)
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140724
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 09:01
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 630
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Asus(1043 8747) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 116
Parallax 132
106% 127 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 119
Splatting 110
109% 138 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 307 304 309 312 310 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 492
Mixed 433
SusWrite 306
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 60
199% 69.2 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 366
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 118%
Great: 129%
OCZ Trion 100 480GB-$139
238GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 121 132 121 123 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76% Very good
Read 512
Write 428
Mixed 410
SusWrite 130
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 18.5
113% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 87.4
133% 250 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$52
59GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 175 173 176 176 174 MB/s
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
79.3% Very good
Read 266
Write 254
Mixed 223
SusWrite 172
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 45.9
158% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 197
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 105%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
959GB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 157 162 160 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 133
Write 130
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 159
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
394GB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 148 149 150 150 151 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 142
Write 148
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 148
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
256% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 109%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 137 146 146 148 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 144
Write 132
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 144
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 108%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
2TB free, PID ab28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 130 129 127 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 48.4
Write 93.9
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 127
118% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
178% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 30.6
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 Builds (Compare 1,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $654
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback