Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 87.2 2-Core 156 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 434 46% 370 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0D1) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.6% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 2.7 4% 4.07 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4.7 3% 4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.6% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 240G 240GB 5,700 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN4763 SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 34 7.8 8 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 448 Write 9.9 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 51.8 28% 135 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 29.9 70% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 137 125% 185 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 102%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 6.8 6.2 6.2 6.4 6.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	5% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 6 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 6 9% 8.77 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SMSD302160011TA8L 07D5 SMSD304160011TA7L 6GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	481x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	88x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	36x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	147x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 1,385 samples	70x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	42x

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $448