Motherboard | Asrock Z390 Pro4 | $195 |
CPU | Intel Core i5-9600K | $233 |
CPU Cooler | Deepcool GAMMAXX 400 | $22 |
GPU | Nvidia RTX 3070 | $500 |
SSD | Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB | $64 |
RAM | Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB | $63 |
Power Supply | Corsair CX650M | $108 |
Case | Cooler Master MasterBox Q500L | $80 |
Total Price | $1,265 |
PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding. |
Graphics | 160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 337% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z390 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190503 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 29 '20 at 01:03 |
Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
107%
Outstanding
|
106% 188 Pts
|
100% 773 Pts
|
62% 924 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3908) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
160%
Outstanding
|
182% 215 fps
|
134% 167 fps
|
|
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$64
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2120 807 775 777 777 777 MB/s
|
337%
Outstanding
|
442% 1,978 MB/s
|
301% 104 MB/s
|
1,254% 1,675 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
108%
Outstanding
|
110% 38.3 GB/s
|
94% 33 GB/s
|
79% 50.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9600KIntel $233Bench 92%, 337,494 samples | 2,193x |
Core i7-9700KIntel $370Bench 96%, 505,453 samples | 1,969x |
Core i9-9900KIntel $660Bench 96%, 479,734 samples | 854x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $500Bench 118%, 582,676 samples | 807x |
RTX 2070Nvidia $450Bench 106%, 475,843 samples | 634x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $315Bench 89%, 595,256 samples | 559x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $1,055 |