Acer NC-V3-772G-747A161TMAKK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer NC-V3-772G-747A161TMAKK  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory21.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 05:55
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 150
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 397
40% 324 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0781) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 6.7
3% 6.23 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500MS240G 240GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 99 89 119 94 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 303
Write 262
Mixed 258
SusWrite 119
53% 235 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 15.1
46% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 152
132% 197 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 120 120 118 126 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61% Good
Read 92.4
Write 116
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 120
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
173% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 61%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT451S6MFR8C-PB Kingston 99U5428-052.A00LF HMT451S6MFR8C-PB Kingston 99U5428-052.A00LF 24GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.9% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 14.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback