Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 04:22
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Memory 96.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 915
89% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 194
Parallax 205
146% 193 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 187
Splatting 127
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2225 2302 753 393 391 389 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 2,593
Write 2408
Mixed 2,089
SusWrite 1,076
458% 2,042 MB/s
4K Read 77.9
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 102
335% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,274
DQ Write 1017
DQ Mixed 1,114
842% 1,135 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 325%
Great: 377%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
142GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1263 357 309 308 308 307 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 2,050
Write 1,370
Mixed 582
SusWrite 475
247% 1,119 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 63.9
233% 88.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,227
DQ Write 1060
DQ Mixed 674
634% 987 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 233%
Great: 236%
WDC WD60EDAZ-11U78B0 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 182 183 182 181 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 210
Write 170
Mixed 117
SusWrite 182
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 1.1
76% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40%
Great: 40%
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
953GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 487 485 486 479 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 487
Mixed 404
SusWrite 482
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 53.4
189% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 260
221% 325 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 124%
Great: 122%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 140 144 144 145 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 139
Write 136
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 142
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 101%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB
327GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 117 114 116 116 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 102
Write 84.3
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 113
128% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 72%
TrekStor DS maxi g.u 1.5TB
80GB free, PID 001b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 44 43 44 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 42.8
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 43.4
55% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4W.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 27
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 26.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 52.2
77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 7,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-F GAMING - $477

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback