| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130205 |
| Uptime | 9.4 Days |
| Run Date | May 10 '20 at 09:55 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.5%
Good
|
56% 89.8 Pts
|
29% 218 Pts
|
16% 265 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Gigabyte(1458 4009) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
79.8%
Very good
|
68% 110 fps
|
102% 130 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 40 40 37 35 39 MB/s
|
65.1%
Good
|
51% 230 MB/s
|
120% 39.4 MB/s
|
130% 203 MB/s
|
|
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB
2TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 14 14 MB/s
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
27% 19.8 MB/s
|
88% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
199GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 15 15 14 14 MB/s
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
25% 18.6 MB/s
|
76% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CL9-9-9 D3-1333 CL9-9-9 D3-1333 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
40.3%
Average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
26% 9.1 GB/s
|
55% 72.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 40x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 7x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples | 4x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 105% - Outstanding | Total price: $237 |