TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-17E2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics92.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE75 Raider 9SF
MotherboardMSI MS-17E2  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190705
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 04:13
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 109
2-Core 194
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 527
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 77.5%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1272) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5730
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
92.9% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 108
Parallax 115
91% 111 fps
MRender 159
Gravity 108
Splatting 96.6
96% 121 fps
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 92.9%
 Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1178 916 920 956 970 1012 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 2,088
Write 1,999
Mixed 1,594
SusWrite 992
374% 1,668 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 64.8
208% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 668
491% 649 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑
This bench: 238%
 Great: 329%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
102GB free
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1016 503 154 366 170 398 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 1,236
Write 1,023
Mixed 128
SusWrite 434
156% 705 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 33.5
109% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 533
DQ Write 71.1
DQ Mixed 128
138% 244 MB/s
Poor: 140% ↑
This bench: 123%
 Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 25.3
MC Mixed 20.8
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 21
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 68%
 Great: 84%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-17E2 Builds (Compare 1,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E2

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1,074x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples457x
Core i9-9880HIntelBench 79%, 11,095 samples10x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples651x
RTX 2070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 88%, 23,316 samples333x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples230x
SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 239%, 34,988 samples204x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples165x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 8,131 samples153x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples469x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples147x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples119x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback