MSI MS-17E2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GE75 Raider 9SF
MotherboardMSI MS-17E2  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 22:18
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 236
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 621
66% 528 Pts
64-Core 733
45% 733 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1272) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5730
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 118
Parallax 113
98% 117 fps
MRender 158
Gravity 107
Splatting 98.6
96% 121 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
239GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1519 1211 1161 1103 1020 980 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,216
Write 2,272
Mixed 1570
SusWrite 1,166
405% 1,806 MB/s
4K Read 59
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 76.3
250% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 895
DQ Write 624
DQ Mixed 774
574% 764 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 272%
Great: 329%
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
168GB free
Firmware: S5Z42102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1142 491 491 491 487 720 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,329
Write 492
Mixed 290
SusWrite 637
151% 687 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 75.9
238% 83.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,030
DQ Write 787
DQ Mixed 436
454% 751 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 207%
Great: 311%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
81% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 22.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 26.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 58.1
69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17E2 Builds (Compare 1,549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback