ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel BasinFalls CRB

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	8.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Intel BasinFalls HEDT platform (SKL-X)
Motherboard	Intel BasinFalls CRB (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170504
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 05 '17 at 20:33
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7920X-$229 5,430 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Memory 77.2 1-Core 131 2-Core 259 85% 156 Pts	4-Core 510 8-Core 932 86% 721 Pts	64-Core 1,842 114% 1,842 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 30,433 User benchmarks, average bench 7% EVGA(3842 2743) 2GB CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 372.90 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.36% Terrible	Lighting 9.73 Reflection 8.54 Parallax 10.1 8% 9.44 fps	MRender 8.95 Gravity 11.8 Splatting 12.3 9% 11 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.36% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Optane+ NVMe PCIe 128GB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 181% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 843 Write 144 Mixed 247 88% 411 MB/s	4K Read 71.2 4K Write 50.2 4K Mixed 46.2 194% 55.9 MB/s	DQ Read 78 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 35.8 49% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 110% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 263%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 251GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 29GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 38.2 Write 32 38% 35.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 8 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	28.8% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 7.2 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 7.2 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235	Nvidia RTX 4070 $499	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback