Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive272% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 13:12
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 169
2-Core 335
107% 199 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 1,098
105% 869 Pts
64-Core 1,581
98% 1,581 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 143
Parallax 132
106% 135 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
102% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1350 307 310 310 310 309 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
272% Outstanding
Read 2,465
Write 1,472
Mixed 1,286
SusWrite 483
316% 1,426 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 90
306% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 975
DQ Write 1,206
DQ Mixed 1,009
784% 1,063 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 272%
Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
127GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 451 456 460 457 448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 449
Mixed 426
SusWrite 453
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 98.4
4K Mixed 61.2
200% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
46GB free
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 422 425 380 174 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 478
Write 271
Mixed 227
SusWrite 336
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 34.8
134% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 114
108% 170 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 99%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB
43GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 277 293 286 295 260 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 486
Write 474
Mixed 423
SusWrite 303
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 38.9
131% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 41
85% 175 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 98%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
552GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 170 170 170 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 170
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 168
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GVK F4-3200C16-8GVGB F4-3200C16-8GVK F4-3200C16-8GVGB 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 32.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 32.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,008 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $765
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback