Packard ixtreme M5801

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemPackard ixtreme M5801  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard ixtreme M5801
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100517
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 11:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 81.5
2-Core 155
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 291
39% 292 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 34
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 33.7
28% 34.4 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 34.6
Splatting 24.1
26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
631GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 155 120 139 166 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 181
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 139
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
83GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 91 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 92.3
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 90.2
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 80CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 80CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ixtreme M5801 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Packard ixtreme M5801

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $399
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback