HP Laptop 15s-eq0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-eq0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86FD
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 11:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 193
68% 121 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 412
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
HP(103C 86FD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.24% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 11.1
6% 9.17 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 9
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.24%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000H1 512GB
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1646 805 765 751 794 789 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2013
Write 1719
Mixed 1429
SusWrite 925
340% 1,522 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 59.5
193% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 551
441% 623 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 227%
Great: 306%
EXU2032GB 32GB
29GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 17 16 17 12 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Read 20.1
Write 12.6
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 15
16% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 13.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-eq0xxx Builds (Compare 326 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-eq0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback