Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3-$104 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Socket 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 186 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 284 42% 304 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 78%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MegaSR 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 3TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 7.7 11 8.2 11 7.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	2.55% Terrible	Read 1 Write 0.5 Mixed 3.5 SusWrite 7.9 2% 3.22 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.55% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 18KSF51272AZ-1G6K1 Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.3% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 18.1 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.1 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1220 v3Intel $104Bench 69%, 5,273 samples	4x
Xeon E3-1271 v3IntelBench 76%, 1,699 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	1x
Radeon HD 4850ATIBench 9%, 1,032 samples	1x

SSD
SU750 512GBAdataBench 88%, 5,057 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x
ServeRAID M5110 292GBIBMBench 141%, 2 samples	1x

RAM
M391B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 32%, 189 samples	2x
18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 4x8GBMicronBench 63%, 323 samples	1x
18KSF1G72AZ-1G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 54%, 571 samples	1x

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $104