TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF  (all builds)
Memory50.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 04:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7920X-$250
, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 133
2-Core 259
83% 154 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 907
81% 686 Pts
64-Core 1,826
113% 1,826 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 78.9%
 Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
MSI(1462 3884)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 204
Parallax 300
124% 219 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 217
Splatting 162
179% 228 fps
Poor: 185% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZPLL1T6HAJQ-00005 1.5TB
556GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GPJA2B3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1752 1786 1762 1760 1566 1668 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,274
Write 1,678
Mixed 1,016
SusWrite 1,716
322% 1,421 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 32.1
129% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 715
DQ Mixed 852
639% 859 MB/s
Poor: 233% ↑
This bench: 233%
 Great: 315%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 58.7
MC Mixed 42.6
138% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 9.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 118%
 Great: 142%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming Pro-CF

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel  $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples38x
Core i7-7800XIntel  $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples22x
Core i9-7940XIntel  $654Bench 83%, 4,560 samples13x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples12x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia  $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples9x
SSD
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples8x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples8x
CS900 240GBPNY  $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples5x
RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples21x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples17x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples13x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $570
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback