Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 20:09
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 91.3
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 323
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.6% Above average
Lighting 64.8
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 67.3
53% 68.6 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 69.6
Splatting 66.6
55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 128GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 92 68 67 83 77 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 367
Write 129
Mixed 103
SusWrite 80.9
37% 170 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 15.6
65% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 31.9
DQ Mixed 61.2
70% 129 MB/s
Samsung 830 Series 120GB
17GB free
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 31 73 27 44 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 408
Write 260
Mixed 182
SusWrite 73.8
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 15.1
61% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 79.2
DQ Mixed 28.1
40% 74.8 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
118GB free
Firmware: 15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 104 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 100
Write 87.9
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 102
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback