| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock Q1900M (all builds) |
| Memory | 14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181220 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 26 '20 at 15:59 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron J1900
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
38.9%
Below average
|
31% 43.6 Pts
|
12% 90.9 Pts
|
6% 91 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
32.5%
Below average
|
30% 41.5 fps
|
38% 47.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 191 171 187 174 187 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
51% 225 MB/s
|
106% 34.3 MB/s
|
136% 181 MB/s
|
|
WD WD50NPZZ-00A9JT0 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 98 101 102 101 MB/s
|
52.9%
Above average
|
66% 90.1 MB/s
|
196% 2.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
27.4%
Poor
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
12% 4.17 GB/s
|
33% 121 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Q1900M Builds (Compare 201 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock Q1900M
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples | 131x |
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 8x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 21% - Poor | Total price: $28 |