Koloe X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 19:11
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 94.2
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 135
62% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 400
41% 330 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1330 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Lighting 67.6
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 84
55% 71.4 fps
MRender 65.3
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 46.6
47% 59.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 82 77 82 85 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 120
Write 115
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 80.4
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
310GB free
Firmware: GR2OA350
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 96 97 97 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 95.2
Write 84.2
Mixed 36.2
SusWrite 97
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ST M25P80 37GB
4266, 33 MHz
4096, 33792 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback