ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1850
Memory	1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130222
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	May 04 '17 at 19:10
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5500B APU 2,596 User benchmarks, average bench 48% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 77.3 1-Core 54.8 2-Core 109 51% 80.4 Pts	4-Core 164 8-Core 160 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7560D 10,029 User benchmarks, average bench 4% HP(103C 1850) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	4.09% Terrible	Lighting 4.77 Reflection 6.96 Parallax 4.72 4% 5.48 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 7.04 4% 5.24 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.09% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 133 4141 (04) Start/Stop count 73 73 27233 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 39 39 44608 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 166 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 74 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 191 191 27233 (C2) HDA temperature 100 85 43 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	38.8% Below average	Read 65.8 Write 69.2 Mixed 64.2 50% 66.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 58%
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB 8,028 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 14GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 781 (03) Spinup time 157 150 3108 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8920 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 25932 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6681 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1855 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9043 (C2) HDA temperature 102 92 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 24432 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	37.4% Below average	Read 64.9 Write 65.2 Mixed 64 49% 64.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.34 83% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
M 1 1 S 6GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.5% Poor	MC Read 10.8 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 8.1 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.2 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

CPU
A8-5500B APUAMDBench 48%, 2,596 samples	159x
A4-5300B APUAMDBench 39%, 2,157 samples	145x
A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)AMDBench 52%, 1,191 samples	60x

GPU
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	134x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	113x
Radeon HD 7660DAMDBench 5%, 7,665 samples	42x

SSD
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	6x

RAM
2x4GBHBench 28%, 136 samples	20x
1x4GBHBench 22%, 243 samples	18x
M 1x4GBSBench 21%, 245 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback