MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory15.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 10:55
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 224
75% 136 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 632
58% 487 Pts
64-Core 894
55% 894 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Lighting 117
Reflection 123
Parallax 155
96% 132 fps
MRender 92.7
Gravity 112
Splatting 75.9
75% 93.7 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 77 13 13 63 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 507
Write 444
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 82
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
46% 11 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
322GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 152 152 152 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 144
Write 144
Mixed 102
SusWrite 152
100% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2666C16D4/16GX 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.5% Excellent
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 28
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 25.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 1,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback