Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6200 Six-Core-$40 5,908 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 76.1 1-Core 67.8 2-Core 121 54% 88.4 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 282 31% 244 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50.3% Above average	Lighting 63.4 Reflection 61.4 Parallax 90.7 52% 71.8 fps	MRender 62.8 Gravity 70.9 Splatting 46.2 48% 60 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 14 295 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 413 Write 374 Mixed 283 SusWrite 64.2 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 25.5 87% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 52.5 DQ Mixed 29.8 25% 35.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 91%
PNY CS1311 240GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 26GB free Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 368 153 7.9 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 415 Write 372 Mixed 303 SusWrite 93.2 66% 296 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 35.7 4K Mixed 25.5 87% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 25.4 DQ Write 52.3 DQ Mixed 29.7 25% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 91%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 102GB free Firmware: CS900E12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 271 154 152 281 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34% Below average	Read 237 Write 95.5 Mixed 83.7 SusWrite 143 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 21.4 4K Mixed 9.5 51% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 13.5 DQ Write 20.6 DQ Mixed 14.3 12% 16.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 34% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB EBJ41UF8BDW0-GN-F 10GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 14.8 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 12 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 88.2 45% 88.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 7570AMDBench 5%, 12,360 samples	9x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	3x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
870 EVO 500G 500GBSamsungBench 88%, 499 samples	2x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI Ramaxel RMR5030MM58E8F1600 NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 10GBNanyaBench 40%, 68 samples	6x
RMR5040MM58F9F1600 RMR5030ED58E8W1600 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 10GBRamaxelBench 38%, 22 samples	2x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 10GBMicronBench 43%, 21 samples	2x

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $71

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16