Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 18:53
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 77.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 295
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 884
87% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,305
81% 1,305 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 198
Reflection 186
Parallax 184
161% 189 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 139
Splatting 123
116% 145 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 137%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 1TB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,332
Write 2,336
Mixed 1,588
395% 1,752 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 72.5
247% 94 MB/s
DQ Read 1,259
DQ Write 1,040
DQ Mixed 1,160
866% 1,153 MB/s
Poor: 145% Great: 310%
OCZ Trion 100 480GB-$139
37GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 127 128 128 110 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 475
Write 400
Mixed 348
SusWrite 152
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 25.9
86% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 155
130% 190 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 90%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
25GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,836
Write 995
Mixed 617
251% 1,149 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 51.8
192% 71.8 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 931
DQ Mixed 393
402% 640 MB/s
Poor: 93% Great: 230%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
136GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 70 52 60 92 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 81.7
Write 42.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 71.7
44% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 110 94 95 48 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 130
Write 153
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 87.8
72% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 BLT8G4D30BET4K.C8FD BLT8G4D30BET4K.C8FD BLT8G4D30AET4K.M8FE1 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 31.6
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 21.1
SC Mixed 28.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $937
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback