Lenovo 2356JY4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2356JY4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2356JY4
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 18:14
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 158
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 239
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2200) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5146
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 3.1
4% 3.2 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 213 241 239 236 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 363
Write 253
Mixed 284
SusWrite 226
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 32.2
108% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 257
198% 270 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback