Lenovo 2356JY4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemLenovo 2356JY4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2356JY4
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130218
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 17:30
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 147
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 236
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 239
15% 239 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2200) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5146
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4
Parallax 3.1
4% 3.83 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 189 212 205 194 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 383
Write 252
Mixed 266
SusWrite 202
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 33.3
111% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 254
193% 262 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CK0 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.9
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback