Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics61.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121012
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '17 at 18:31
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 83.4
1-Core 43
2-Core 81.6
47% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 128
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 139
9% 139 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.8% Good
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 93.4
Parallax 110
52% 89.1 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 98.8
Splatting 99.9
81% 98.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX900 128GB-$103
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.2a Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 486
Write 136
Mixed 179
58% 267 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 12.6
72% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 20
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 9.33
23% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA330 1TB
331GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 102
Write 106
Mixed 102
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.31
4K Mixed 0.32
78% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 1600G 04CB DDR3 1600G 04CB 04CB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 18.4
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback