Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_OK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DU_OK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory0.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime9.5 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 21:11
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 166
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 507
48% 398 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.30.02
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 80.4
Parallax 23.7
15% 40.9 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 20.5
15% 17.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 14%
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.93
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.4% Good
Lighting 86.2
Reflection 85
Parallax 75.6
70% 82.2 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 78.2
Splatting 74.3
68% 84.2 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 999
Write 917
Mixed 936
212% 950 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 43.4
140% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 463
DQ Write 691
DQ Mixed 632
463% 595 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 181%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH CT4G4SFS824A.C8FF 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.8% Above average
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 8.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback