PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds) |
Memory | 14.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140604 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 03 '17 at 11:14 |
Run Duration | 108 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.6%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
94.8%
Outstanding
|
||||
50.1%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
58.6%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 48x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 27x |
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 5x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $642 |