TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 08:30
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 116
2-Core 233
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 707
71% 579 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 80.5%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
MSI(1462 3411)
CLim: 1242 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
51% Above average
Lighting 65.3
Reflection 64.2
Parallax 83.6
53% 71 fps
MRender 62.2
Gravity 60.3
Splatting 51.6
47% 58 fps
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 51%
 Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SH00R480GB 480GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 134 225 149 231 156 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.5% Below average
Read 141
Write 57.1
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 186
27% 119 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 15.1
60% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 25.3
DQ Mixed 21
17% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑
This bench: 36.5%
 Great: 93%
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45
925GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 101 102 148 149 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 171
Write 135
Mixed 86.4
SusWrite 122
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 84.1%
 Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FD CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.8% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 45.8%
 Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD  $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples27x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples24x
Ryzen 5 1400AMD  $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples15x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples15x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples11x
SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung  $36Bench 104%, 296,814 samples7x
Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel  $65Bench 104%, 11,104 samples5x
A400 120GBKingston  $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples5x
RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $39Bench 84%, 287,720 samples7x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples5x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 37,374 samples5x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback