Csl-computer A0000001

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCsl-computer A0000001  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TUF B450-PLUS GAMING
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 07:24
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 974
86% 732 Pts
64-Core 1,300
80% 1,300 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 117
Parallax 206
111% 153 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 130
Splatting 161
114% 135 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 109%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT23B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 453
Write 312
Mixed 294
78% 353 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 34.6
129% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 232
189% 266 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 126%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
613GB free
Firmware: 411040RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 439
Write 395
Mixed 291
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 46.1
149% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 152
169% 288 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 118%
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75
443GB free
Firmware: MH000K
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 103
Write 35.7
Mixed 34
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 56%
Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120G 120GB
67GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 217
Write 206
Mixed 181
255% 201 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 20.6
1,568% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 31
DQ Mixed 25.4
2,004% 26.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 155%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4RL.M8FE1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 38
116% 40.4 GB/s
SC Read 30
SC Write 43.3
SC Mixed 33.3
102% 35.5 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A0000001 Builds (Compare 1,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

System: Csl-computer A0000001

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $641
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback