Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 235%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200207
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 04:10
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9940X-$790
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 72.2
1-Core 157
2-Core 311
95% 180 Pts
4-Core 622
8-Core 1,236
110% 929 Pts
64-Core 2,997
186% 2,997 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$785
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 287
Reflection 290
Parallax 364
234% 314 fps
MRender 335
Gravity 255
Splatting 146
190% 245 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 195%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 539 461 435 422 400 388 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2594
Write 527
Mixed 1,086
SusWrite 441
253% 1,162 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 79.4
268% 96.4 MB/s
DQ Read 828
DQ Write 649
DQ Mixed 751
558% 743 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 247%
Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
269GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 473 475 479 478 481 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 490
Mixed 474
SusWrite 475
110% 488 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 59.9
200% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 144 148 146 137 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 146
Write 150
Mixed 97
SusWrite 144
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
323% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2000 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 47.7
MC Mixed 29.1
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 9.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 96.4
42% 96.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 89%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $791
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback