Asus G750JW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G750JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JW
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130523
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateMay 02 '17 at 23:29
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 193
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 507
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 765M
Asus(1043 119D) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 19.7
14% 17.1 fps
MRender 17.7
Gravity 20.7
Splatting 14.6
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 508
Write 369
Mixed 237
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 5.42
54% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 2.06
6% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 86%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
463GB free
Firmware: 0002SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 90.7
Mixed 87.3
68% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.39
93% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 0118 64C0JKHNJ M471B5173BH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.3
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JW Builds (Compare 393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $408
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback