Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 119%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 16:34
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
98% 180 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 1,181
98% 850 Pts
64-Core 1,172
72% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 163
Parallax 177
142% 171 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 146
Splatting 106
115% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 174 172 168 161 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 493
Write 169
Mixed 218
SusWrite 170
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 34.6
152% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 190
160% 238 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 129%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 500GB
410GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 531
Write 487
Mixed 408
106% 476 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 55.4
191% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 266
206% 277 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 316%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
62GB free
Firmware: U21010RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 423 420 424 427 428 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 420
Mixed 277
SusWrite 423
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 19.5
130% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 116
123% 199 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
696GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 130 131 128 129 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 121
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 128
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 114%
Generic- Compact Flash 16GB
2GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
7.08% Terrible
Read 17.5
Write 9.7
Mixed 4
SusWrite 13.6
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.08%
Great: 16%
WD My Passport 2TB
638GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 78 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 64.2
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 76.7
84% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 44%
SMI USB DISK 4GB
1GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 2.9 2.8 4.4 3 2.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Read 22.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 3.3
8% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 24.3
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 23.5
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,681 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,096
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback