Asus H170-PLUS D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H170-PLUS D3  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 05:09
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 84.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 222
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 647
66% 535 Pts
64-Core 631
39% 631 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 13AA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 133
Parallax 149
117% 142 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 127
Splatting 105
108% 137 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 111%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
713GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 424 428 448 434 419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 455
Mixed 316
SusWrite 426
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 41.4
154% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 284
228% 322 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 164 166 172 171 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 151
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 168
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170-PLUS D3 Builds (Compare 265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H170-PLUS D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback