Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2808 698 User benchmarks, average bench 31% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	27% Poor	Memory 47 1-Core 21.4 2-Core 42.1 25% 36.8 Pts	4-Core 42.3 8-Core 42.5 6% 42.4 Pts	64-Core 42.7 3% 42.7 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 189 207 214 208 214 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.1% Average	Read 186 Write 169 Mixed 129 SusWrite 206 39% 172 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 19.9 67% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 83.8 DQ Mixed 43.3 46% 76.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 86%
General UDisk 4GB 5,358 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.8 1.9 1.8 1.6 1.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Read 9.8 Write 1.7 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 1.7 4% 3.72 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Teikon TMT425S6CFR6A-PBHJ 1x2GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N2807IntelBench 31%, 814 samples	27x
Celeron N2808IntelBench 31%, 698 samples	15x
Pentium N3540IntelBench 33%, 17,036 samples	4x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	49x

RAM
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 2,696 samples	12x
TMT425S6CFR6A-PBNJ 1x2GBTeikonBench 16%, 108 samples	10x
TMT451S6BFR8A-PBHJ 1x4GBTeikonBench 25%, 1,233 samples	4x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16