Asus SABERTOOTH Z170 S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z170 S  (all builds)
Memory20.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 18:36
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 119
2-Core 203
81% 138 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 638
62% 507 Pts
64-Core 613
38% 613 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 901 473 541 500 514 478 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,252
Write 1,727
Mixed 1,209
SusWrite 568
268% 1,189 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 47.7
158% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,211
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 192
258% 502 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 163%
Great: 262%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
93GB free
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 176 188 179 188 175 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 300
Write 236
Mixed 246
SusWrite 177
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 35.2
122% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 83.3
DQ Mixed 161
115% 149 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 84%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$94
2TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 132 128 135 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 138
Write 127
Mixed 104
SusWrite 130
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 88%
WD My Book 1230 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1065
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 132 127 135 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 127
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 129
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 75%
WD WD4000FDYZ-27YA5B0 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2E.J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 124 120 127 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 126
Write 120
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 122
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX2133C14D4/8G KHX2133C14D4/4G KHX2133C14D4/8G 24GB
2720, 2720, 2720, 2720 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 29.1
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 35.5
SC Mixed 27.8
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z170 S Builds (Compare 766 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z170 S - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $790
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback